RUBBERDUCK 2.0 FLIPS EVERYTHING AROUND.
When numbering versions, incrementing the “major” digit is reserved for breaking changes – and that’s exactly what Rubberduck 2.0 will introduce.
I have these changes in my own personal fork at the moment, not yet PR’d into the main repository.. but as more and more people fork the main repo I feel a need to go over some of the changes that are about to happen to the code base.
If you’re wondering, it’s becoming clearer now, that Rubberduck 2.0 will not be released until another couple of months – at this rate we’re looking at something like the end of winter 2016… but it’s going to be worth the wait.
Inversion of Control
In Rubberduck 1.x we had a class called RubberduckMenu, which was responsible for creating the add-in’s menu items. Then we had a RefactorMenu class, which was in theory responsible for creating the Refactor sub-menu under the main Rubberduck menu and in the code pane context menu. As more and more features were added, these classes became cluttered with more and more responsibilities, and it became clear that we needed a more maintainable way of implementing this, in a way that wouldn’t require us to modify a menu class whenever we needed to add a functionality.
In the Rubberduck 2.0 code base, RubberduckMenu and RefactorMenu (and every other “Menu” class) is deprecated, and all the per-functionality code is being moved into dedicated “Command” classes. For now everything is living in the Rubberduck.UI.Command namespace – we’ll eventually clean that up, but the beauty here is that adding a new menu item amounts to simply implementing the new functionality; take the TestExplorerCommand for example:
public class TestExplorerCommand : CommandBase
{
private readonly IPresenter _presenter;
public TestExplorerCommand(IPresenter presenter)
{
_presenter = presenter;
}
public override void Execute(object parameter)
{
_presenter.Show();
}
}
Really, that’s all there is to it. The “Test Explorer” menu item is even simpler:
public class TestExplorerCommandMenuItem : CommandMenuItemBase
{
public TestExplorerCommandMenuItem(ICommand command)
: base(command)
{
}
public override string Key { get { return "TestMenu_TextExplorer"; }}
public override int DisplayOrder { get { return (int)UnitTestingMenuItemDisplayOrder.TestExplorer; } }
}
The IoC container (Ninject) knows to inject a TestExplorerCommand for this ICommand constructor parameter, merely by a naming convention (and a bit of reflection magic); the Key property is used for fetching the localized resource – this means Rubberduck 2.0 will no longer need to re-construct the entire application when the user changes the display language in the options dialog: we simply call the parent menu’s Localize method, and all captions get updated to the selected language. …and modifying the display order of menu items is now as trivial as changing the order of enum members:
public enum UnitTestingMenuItemDisplayOrder
{
TestExplorer,
RunAllTests,
AddTestModule,
AddTestMethod,
AddTestMethodExpectedError
}
The “downside” is that the code that initializes all the menu items has been moved to a dedicated Ninject module (CommandbarsModule), and relies quite heavily on reflection and naming conventions… which can make things appear “automagic” to someone new to the code base or unfamiliar with Dependency Injection. For example, ICommand is automatically bound to FooCommand when it is requested in the constructor of FooCommandMenuItem, and we now have dedicated methods for setting up which IMenuItem objects appear under each “parent menu”:
private IMenuItem GetRefactoringsParentMenu()
{
var items = new IMenuItem[]
{
_kernel.Get<RefactorRenameCommandMenuItem>(),
_kernel.Get<RefactorExtractMethodCommandMenuItem>(),
_kernel.Get<RefactorReorderParametersCommandMenuItem>(),
_kernel.Get<RefactorRemoveParametersCommandMenuItem>(),
};
return new RefactoringsParentMenu(items);
}
The end result, is that instead of creating menus in the VBE’s commandbars and handling their click events in the same place, we’ve now completely split a number of responsibilities into different types, so that the App class can now be injected with a very clean AppMenu object:
public class AppMenu : IAppMenu
{
private readonly IEnumerable<IParentMenuItem> _menus;
public AppMenu(IEnumerable<IParentMenuItem> menus)
{
_menus = menus;
}
public void Initialize()
{
foreach (var menu in _menus)
{
menu.Initialize();
}
}
public void EvaluateCanExecute(RubberduckParserState state)
{
foreach (var menu in _menus)
{
menu.EvaluateCanExecute(state);
}
}
public void Localize()
{
foreach (var menu in _menus)
{
menu.Localize();
}
}
}
These changes, as welcome as they are, have basically broken the entire application… for the Greater Good. Rubberduck 2.0 will be unspeakably easier to maintain and extend.
Rubberduck News 